|
It would seem that with the ongoing and heated debate going
on between the Democrats and the Republicans with regard
to the issue of Social Security reform that enough food-for-
thought would be provided on this subject for the average
person. But apparently, however, the debate itself is not
enough since there are people out there who in fact are deliberating
the topic enough for them to actually place wagers on how
and when the issue will be resolved. In Dublin, Ireland,
Intrade, the online futures market lists three futures contracts
that give traders the opportunity to bet on whether or not
a law will be passed that would permit United States workers
to divert a part of their Social Security taxes directly
into individual investment accounts.
The first contract allows traders to bet on whether they
think a law allowing the individual investment accounts will
be passed by December 31, 2005. The second contract allows
traders to bet on whether or not the law will be passed by
June 30, 2006, while a third contract includes those who
desire to wager that the law will be passed by December 31,
2006. At this point, most of the wagers placed do not favor
the individual accounts. Traders predict only a nine percent
chance for the law passing by this December. That it will
be passed by June 30 of next year has received a 21 percent
chance and passage by December 31, 2006 has received a somewhat
higher chance of 27 percent.
Those who in fact doubt the predictive power of this type
of wagering, should check again. As an example, a day prior
to the last presidential election, Intrade traders correctly
predicted that George Bush would win the election. Not only
that, but they actually also correctly predicted the outcome
for fifty states and the District of Columbia. In addition,
Additionally, Intrade traders correctly predicted the winner
in 33 out of 34 Senate races. If that isn’t enough,
traders also accurately called the winner for the papal elections
a full two days before the official announcement.
Anyone who lives in the United States, however, should
think again before making an online wager with regard to
Social Security reform (or any other online wager for that
matter). That is because Internet gambling is illegal in
the United States, being banned under the articles of the
1960’s Wire Act. Former director of the New Jersey
Division of Gaming Enforcement Frank Catanial, who is also
a current consultant to the online gambling industry, says
that the whole Internet gambling issue is a “gray area”.
He also points out that there is not total agreement among
all legal analysts with regard to the Wire Act, that it covers
Internet gambling, since the law was introduced well before
Internet gambling was ever contemplated. Another factor clouding
the legal status of Internet gambling is the fact that some
states have a plain and absolute ban on online gambling while
other states do not.
Back to June 2005 News home
|